Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 01:34:04 +0100 From: Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net> To: kpneal@pobox.com Cc: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: top, fixed buffer length in utils.c Message-ID: <54D0177C.7070407@sorbs.net> In-Reply-To: <54D01598.5050400@sorbs.net> References: <20150201175159.7fa88d16@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> <20150201195722.68845794@akips.com> <20150201211125.2fb21c39@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> <20150202023709.GA28422@neutralgood.org> <20150202143153.51638086@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> <20150202212237.GA26193@neutralgood.org> <54D01598.5050400@sorbs.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michelle Sullivan wrote: > kpneal@pobox.com wrote: > >> At this point in history the odds of a general purpose computing platform >> with ints > 32 bits having any success in the market is roughly the same >> as the chance a metor will stike your house tonight. >> > 1 in 4,000,000,000,000 (approx) then...? :P > > Sorry for the second email, I forgot to add: You'll never need more than 640k of RAM... ;-) (and yes I know that's not the actual quote) -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54D0177C.7070407>