Date: Sun, 7 May 2017 08:02:17 -0700 From: Ngie Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> To: mmokhi@freebsd.org Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r317884 - head/sys/compat/linprocfs Message-ID: <FB9379D3-6B6B-411B-8138-765775D10359@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAN9adSN2wP-PXL2oB5mZCLnwSW3ynE-LANdGV46wWsoctA4oTw@mail.gmail.com> References: <201705061737.v46Hb1Aq067178@repo.freebsd.org> <20170506175528.GZ1622@kib.kiev.ua> <CAN9adSNRz0wPGive1C7rsumFvoQXtVt_5o9sZ=VfuuVKmAaaGg@mail.gmail.com> <CAN9adSN2wP-PXL2oB5mZCLnwSW3ynE-LANdGV46wWsoctA4oTw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On May 6, 2017, at 11:43, Mahdi Mokhtari <mmokhi@freebsd.org> wrote: >=20 > Also I think it worths saying, I've tested this running on a X86. > It was not panic'd and printed data as expected. > So you mean it's possible to panic on "some" cases because of CPUID suppor= t? You'll get a hardware trap if/when the CPU doesn't support the instruction, w= hich will result in a panic. Cheers, -Ngie=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FB9379D3-6B6B-411B-8138-765775D10359>