Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:46:55 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/contrib/pf/net if_pflog.c if_pflog.h if_pfsync.c if_pfsync.h pf.c pf_ioctl.c pf_norm.c pf_osfp.c pf_table.c pfvar.h src/sys/contrib/pf/netinet in4_cksum.c Message-ID: <20040226154655.GE46714@madman.celabo.org> In-Reply-To: <20040226060126.GA70201@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <200402260234.i1Q2YDx1014240@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040226060126.GA70201@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[Disclaimer: I am long-time, loyal IPFilter user and I think everything else is crap. :-) ] On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 10:01:26PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > Was this import discussed on arch@ or current@? We now have ipfw, ipfilter, > and pf in the base system. How many more firewall packages are we going > to import into the base system? Are you going to remove ipfw or ipfilter? > Is there a NO_PF make.conf knob? Choice is good. Three firewalls is maybe pushing the limit, but these three are Very Important to our community. NO_PF, NO_IPF, and NO_IPFW would be good--- anyone have tested patches? The only downside IMHO is now I have to watch for security issues in pf :-) Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040226154655.GE46714>