Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 18:22:29 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: kato@migmatite.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp (KATO Takenori) Cc: dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie, current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Recursive mount [ was Re: -STABLE reboots ] Message-ID: <199710231822.LAA29050@usr02.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <199710221247.VAA01644@gneiss.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp> from "KATO Takenori" at Oct 22, 97 09:47:53 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Could someone add a sysctl to current that makes > > mount a privilaged syscall? > > How about following patch? [ ... ] Makeing mount priveledged is a kludge. Is this a production environment patch? If so, I'll let the discussion go... otherwise, the mount code needs changed. Specifically, the mapping into the hierarchy and the NFS export management should be in the upper level code instead of per VFS. There's not really any conceptual difference between root and non-root mounts, once the greation of a mount struct instance is abstracted from it's mapping into the FS hierarchy by moving the latter into common code. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710231822.LAA29050>