Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 13:39:12 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 205565] devel/py-setuptools27: failure to recognize entry_points Message-ID: <bug-205565-21822-CaRkJbZYnb@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-205565-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-205565-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205565 --- Comment #6 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- Created attachment 167565 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=167565&action=edit Fixed line_profiler Makefile Changes: shebangfix is unecessary for console_scripts, as setuptools rewrites the shebang line for the version of Python that the package is being build with already. The Cython port does not include PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX. The BUILD_DEPENDS line was incorrect on this basis. Cython is only required as a build dependency for sources that have not been preprocessed (ie: raw from the repo), and not PyPI source distributions (sdists) Given only kernprof is references as a console_script, and setuptools --record output (which autoplist uses) contains this script in bin/, PLIST_FILES is unnecessary Custom installation of kernprof in post-install is unnecessary. My reading of the line_profiler README [1] only indicates kernprof as a CLI script, with line_profiler only for use as a programmatic module. In particular, the README specifically demonstrates use of line_profiler as follows: ``` python -m line_profiler ``` [1] https://github.com/rkern/line_profiler -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-205565-21822-CaRkJbZYnb>