Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 10:01:28 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: audit@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Fernando Schapachnik <fschapachnik@vianetworks.com.ar>, Daniel Hagan <dhagan@colltech.com>, Roman Shterenzon <roman@xpert.com>, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, greid@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org Subject: Re: bin/23944: Proposed modification to ftpd Message-ID: <200101071701.f07H1Ts32049@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 07 Jan 2001 08:56:58 PST." <20010107085658.A94429@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20010107085658.A94429@dragon.nuxi.com> <3A536F7C.71DA4C2E@colltech.com> <200101041351.KAA96373@ns1.via-net-works.net.ar>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20010107085658.A94429@dragon.nuxi.com> "David O'Brien" writes: : On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:51:52AM -0300, Fernando Schapachnik wrote: : > En un mensaje anterior, Daniel Hagan escribió: : > > I've been poking around GNATS today, and I noticed misc/24034, a : > > semi-related patch. If this (bin/23944) gets committed, someone needs : > > to update the code from 24034 as well. : > : > The patch I'm attaching contains a reworked version of my original : > patch and a fix for misc/24034 under the new scenario. The only : : People do realize that ftpd is going away in a month don't they?? I didn't realize this had been a done deal. I had thought that my list of "features that we have now, but netbsd's ftpd doesn't have" was enough to slow that down. Should I repost that rather lengthy list again? Or is it somehow irrelevant? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101071701.f07H1Ts32049>