Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 17 Jun 2018 09:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
From:      "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
To:        Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>, Juli Mallett <juli@northcloak.com>, "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@freebsd.org>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r335270 - head/lib/liby
Message-ID:  <201806171620.w5HGKAvG060870@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxg=NOaEVjWtsW7LxCMM=ui0byqpDGjeM1QNRZZ64sh-Q-w@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 17 June 2018 at 08:49, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > All this drama about "copying" one line of text and adding another to
> > create a new file. The no-brainer fix is to add a proper new-file
> > license and stop arguing about what flavor of copying and what rules
> > might apply to that.
> 
> I didn't add my copyright since I didn't write it. I'll rewrite from
> scratch and add my own new-file copyright. This file contains
> precisely zero creative output [0] so it should't matter too much.

I am fine with that solution.  I am *not* fine with stamping UCB
copyrights on something without source traceability to the UCB
file that it came from.  I hope all can understand that issue.
If you can't lets take it offline.

> 
> > And for something that might actually matter: nobody seems to have
> > noticed that this new header file lacks the standard include guards
> > (something which style(9) seems to be silent about).
> 
> Good point.

You normally do not need to do include guards on
header files used by a single program.

> 
> [0] Oracle v Google notwithstanding
> 

-- 
Rod Grimes                                                 rgrimes@freebsd.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201806171620.w5HGKAvG060870>