Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:27:47 +0000 From: Nali Toja <nalitoja@gmail.com> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>, "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Patch for ports on 10-current Message-ID: <86y5wrnxak.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E935C9C.2090502@FreeBSD.org> (Doug Barton's message of "Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:59:08 -0700") References: <4E935C9C.2090502@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> writes: > http://dougbarton.us/bam.patch [...] > +.if ${OSVERSION} >= 1000000 && !defined(NO_AUTOTOOLS_FIX) Being not limited to GNU_CONFIGURE, is it a feature? Also, there are a few ports that either set WRKSRC instead of BUILD_WRKSRC or extract several distfiles. Why not use WRKDIR then? # lang/python27, it does not use devel/libffi (ports/146823) WRKSRC/../Modules/_ctypes/libffi/configure: freebsd1*) WRKSRC/../Modules/_ctypes/libffi/configure:freebsd1*)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86y5wrnxak.fsf>