Date: Fri, 8 Dec 1995 07:32:26 +0200 (SAT) From: John Hay <jhay@mikom.csir.co.za> To: julian@ref.tfs.com (Julian Elischer) Cc: terry@lambert.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FYI Message-ID: <199512080532.HAA03443@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> In-Reply-To: <199512080131.RAA24828@ref.tfs.com> from "Julian Elischer" at Dec 7, 95 05:31:41 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>
>
> neat.. so xxx is running on the 2nd processor?
>
> >
> > ps -gax
> > PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND
> > 234 p0 R 0:16.11 ./xxx
>
> > main()
> > {
> > for(;;)
> > continue;
> > }
> does it explode if it tries to do a syscall?
>
> >
> > dmesg:
> >
> > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor: 2 processors
> > FreeBSD 2.0-BUILT-19951207 #7: Thu Dec 7 17:30:55 MST 1995
> ^^^^^
> how much work to get the patches up-to date?
>
> > terry@phaeton.artisoft.com:/usr/src.org/sys/compile/SMP
> > CPU: 90-MHz Pentium 735\\90 (Pentium-class CPU)
> > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x525 Stepping=5
> > Features=0x3bf<FPU,VME,PSE,MCE,CX8,APIC>
> what would it take to get a probe of the other processor too?
>
> >
> julian
>
>
Hey what about the two most important questions?
1. Are we going to see it in the cvs tree at some stage?
2. If we are, when? :-)))
Jokes aside, I am realy interrested. My machine at home have a dual pentium
motherboard. It only need a second processor.
John
--
John Hay -- John.Hay@csir.co.za
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199512080532.HAA03443>