Date: Tue, 24 Sep 1996 21:16:57 -0700
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc: nate@mt.sri.com, current@freebsd.org, imp@village.org
Subject: Re: install on {Net,Open}BSD vs install on FreeBSD
Message-ID: <8836.843625017@time.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 25 Sep 1996 14:04:45 %2B1000." <199609250404.OAA26240@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> >1. The other *BSDs are using it, and failure to implement it will > > leave us gratuitously incompatible in Yet Another Way. That sucks. > > Script started on Tue Sep 24 13:52:08 1996 > [BSD/OS machine] > ttyp1:bde@spatter:/a/bde> install -d zz zz1 > install: illegal option -- d > usage: install [-cs] [-f flags] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] file1 file2; > or file1 ... fileN directory [ .. Keith bcc'd rather than cc'd in order to prevent him from being dragged through the rest of this thread ..] OK, so then it's: BSDI, FreeBSD OpenBSD, NetBSD That still doesn't equal much more than an undesirable split, even if you try and lump OpenBSD and NetBSD together. Maybe we should ask Keith if they want to add the -d option to install in BSD/OS 2.2? ;-) Jordanhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8836.843625017>