Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 16:05:45 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 268348] math/py-numpy: introduce FORTRAN / NOBLAS options Message-ID: <bug-268348-21822-ZLJJ4FZ9XU@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-268348-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-268348-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D268348 Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|python@FreeBSD.org |0mp@FreeBSD.org Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(python | |@FreeBSD.org) Status|Closed |In Progress URL| |https://reviews.freebsd.org | |/D52469 CC| |0mp@FreeBSD.org, | |python@FreeBSD.org Resolution|Not Accepted |--- --- Comment #19 from Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org> --- Hello python@, I've reworked the original patch and I wonder if you could take another loo= k. I agree with Charlie that we need to be careful when adding extra options to Python ports. A potential pilot error could lead to a lot of frustration and long debugging. To address that I added an explicit warning to the option description. There is a precedence for such warnings in the ports tree and = it is a good middle ground for different ports usergroups. Regarding NumPy's support for NOBLAS: it is fully supported via internal fallback routines. Their implementation is not very performant, however, so= the option description warns about that. The new patch is here: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D52469 Best, Mateusz --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-268348-21822-ZLJJ4FZ9XU>