Date: Fri, 8 Mar 1996 04:57:44 -0800 (PST) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: torstenb@tlk.com Cc: torstenb@tlk.com, coredump@nervosa.com, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/libwww - Imported sources Message-ID: <199603081257.EAA20992@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <m0tv0LZ-00021vC@solar.tlk.com> (torstenb@solar.tlk.com)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* I meant: it's only usefull for people who want to develop a www application * with this particular library. I know what you meant. The "www" is the keyword there. * autoconf, bcc, bison and so on are not useful for "Joe FreeBSD user" - that's * why they are in the "devel" directory... No, they are there because they are develpment tools and also don't fit into any other category. The libwww port is both a development tool and a www-related package. And as I said before, when there are two or more categories that a port belongs to, the "catch-net" category wins -- like japanese, russian, and www. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603081257.EAA20992>