Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 21:37:12 +0200 From: Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Thomas Abthorpe <tabthorpe@freebsd.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Tobias Rehbein <tobias.rehbein@web.de>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/stonesoup Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/games/stonesoup/files patch-AppHdr.h patch-makefile patch-rltiles__Makefile Message-ID: <4C5F0768.10004@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20100808193035.GB26232@FreeBSD.org> References: <201008081759.o78Hxath039177@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100808193035.GB26232@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08-08-2010 21:30, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 05:59:36PM +0000, Rene Ladan wrote: >> rene 2010-08-08 17:59:36 UTC >> >> FreeBSD ports repository >> >> Modified files: >> games/stonesoup Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist >> games/stonesoup/files patch-AppHdr.h patch-makefile >> Added files: >> games/stonesoup/files patch-rltiles__Makefile >> Log: >> - Update to 0.7.1 >> - Split off SDL version into games/stonesoup-sdl slave port >> - Note the new WWW site in pkg-descr > > What was wrong with having SDL support in OPTIONS? PR does not give > sufficient details. > > We generally try to avoid creating slaves unless fairly strong reason > exist. Lots of ports optionally support SDL, imagine the numbers if we > factored it all out in to slaves. > Actually there is nothing wrong with having SDL support in OPTIONS, I merely followed the PR. If you can convince the maintainer to revert factoring out SDL support, I'll be happy to make the corresponding commit. Rene -- http://www.rene-ladan.nl/ GPG fingerprint = ADBC ECCD EB5F A6B4 549F 600D 8C9E 647A E564 2BFC (subkeys.pgp.net)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C5F0768.10004>