Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:48:19 +0200 From: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/mpatrol Makefile ports/devel/mpatrol/files patch-..::..::src::mptrace.c Message-ID: <20061103064819.GA64957@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> In-Reply-To: <454ADF4A.5080201@FreeBSD.org> References: <200611030351.kA33peWQ061783@repoman.freebsd.org> <20061103061317.GB64699@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <454ADF4A.5080201@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 10:18:50PM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Vasil Dimov wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 03:51:40AM +0000, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> >>sobomax 2006-11-03 03:51:40 UTC
> >[...]
> >> Added files:
> >> devel/mpatrol/files patch-..::..::src::mptrace.c=20
> >
> >Aargh :-/
> >I thought we were supposed to use Tools/scripts/splitpatch.pl for new
> >patches.
>=20
> Why so? We have Tools/scripts/patchtool.py for the few years now.
The note I made was about the convention, not the exact tool used. You
should read:
"I thought we were supposed to use the convention used by
Tools/scripts/splitpatch.pl for new patches."
And by the way these scripts use essentially the same convention
for naming new patches.
--=20
Vasil Dimov
gro.DSBeerF@dv
%
You never know what is enough until you know what is more than enough.
-- William Blake
--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFFSuYzFw6SP/bBpCARArzlAJ0SpVlMSPFsyzK5zeEJ68ZmYNEhmACfejbL
0FGL7p9Wa/+WEsy5deiaY8I=
=e/GM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061103064819.GA64957>