Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:41:31 +0200
From:      Adi Pircalabu <apircalabu@bitdefender.com>
To:        Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Security port: automated integration in the mail/file server - to do or not to do ?
Message-ID:  <20050113114131.5f1ae808@apircalabu.dsd.ro>
In-Reply-To: <20050112165810.07364fcd@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
References:  <20050112152102.57fc843a@apircalabu.dsd.ro> <20050112165810.07364fcd@it.buh.tecnik93.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:58:10 +0200
Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> wrote:

> While I try to make my ports as user friendly and automated as
> possible, I would vote for 2) above. I hate when something just
> changes on my system without me telling it to do so explicitly; plus I
> could very well install the port today and wait to the end of the week
> to switch it on for testing; plus there will always be some strange
> edge cases when you'll just break some custom configuration.

Thank you for answering. I'll think about your answer, trying to balance
the opinions on this topic, but the adequate decision is still quite
difficult to take at this moment. Any other opinions which I should
consider?

-- 
Adrian Pircalabu

Public KeyID = 0xF902393A


-- 
This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender.
For more information please visit http://www.bitdefender.com/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050113114131.5f1ae808>