Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 09:07:22 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> Cc: Patrick Thomas <root@utility.clubscholarship.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tune down recvspace for this ? Message-ID: <20020627160722.GK18877@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20020627071056.N67834-100000@patrocles.silby.com> References: <20020627030821.M68572-100000@utility.clubscholarship.com> <20020627071056.N67834-100000@patrocles.silby.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> [020627 05:10] wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Patrick Thomas wrote: > > > 99/10208/34816 mbufs in use (current/peak/max): > > > > Would changing net.inet.tcp.recvspace down to 32768 (default is 65536) be > > a wise thing to do ? > > > > Or are there other better suggestions ? > > > > thanks, > > > > PT > > Actually, you usually use most of your mbuf (clusters) for sending, not > receiving. Hence, sendspace is what you may wish to kick down in order to > reduce usage. True, but it looks like he could raise nmbclusters in his config intead of throttling. -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020627160722.GK18877>