Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 23:11:54 -0700 From: Mike Haertel <mike@ducky.net> To: Mike Haertel <mike@ducky.net> Cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, Luoqi Chen <luoqi@watermarkgroup.com>, dfr@nlsystems.com, jeremyp@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, mike@ducky.net Subject: Re: "objtrm" problem probably found (was Re: Stuck in "objtrm") Message-ID: <199907130611.XAA18700@ducky.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 12 Jul 1999 23:09:19 PDT." <199907130609.XAA18672@ducky.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Second answer: in the real world, we're nearly always hitting the
>cache on stack operations associated with calls and argument passing,
>but not less often on operations in the procedure body. So, in
^^^ typo
Urk. I meant to say "less often", delete the "not".
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907130611.XAA18700>