Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 16:54:07 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 226850] [pf] Matching but failed rules block without return Message-ID: <bug-226850-8-QKs5pyQO32@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-226850-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-226850-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D226850 Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cem@freebsd.org --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> --- Is this compatible with OpenBSD pf? (I doubt we should be adding novel syn= tax to a mostly unsupported old fork of OpenBSD pf.) If OpenBSD does it, then = it may make sense. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-226850-8-QKs5pyQO32>