Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Aug 2000 01:01:59 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>
To:        "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: People running with LOCALBASE set to something other than /usr/local?
Message-ID:  <14755.26839.743103.399203@guru.mired.org>
In-Reply-To: <20000822084309.D38787@hamlet.nectar.com>
References:  <14754.2222.927759.462718@guru.mired.org> <20000822084309.D38787@hamlet.nectar.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jacques A. Vidrine writes:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 11:59:26PM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
> > I'm curious - are there any committers who regularly use a system with
> > LOCALBASE set to something other than /usr/local?
> 
> I have LOCALBASE=/opt for a couple of years now.
> 
> OTOH, I also have a symlink from /usr/local -> /opt due to a small
> but significant number of ports that are not PREFIX clean.

Um - why? If you removed the setting of LOCALBASE in that case, you
wouldn't change the disk layout at all.

However, I was wondering if there was anyone who could fix things that
weren't PREFIX clean who would also find them on a regular
basis. That's not you.

	Thanx,
	<mike



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14755.26839.743103.399203>