Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 9 Nov 2001 10:46:31 -0800
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG, peter@wemm.org
Subject:   Re: HEADS UP: cvs repository surgery
Message-ID:  <20011109104631.A51278@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <200111091539.fA9FdSf88433@bunrab.catwhisker.org>; from david@catwhisker.org on Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 07:39:28AM -0800
References:  <20011109001626.11DF43807@overcee.netplex.com.au> <200111091539.fA9FdSf88433@bunrab.catwhisker.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 07:39:28AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> >Yes, there are some intentional differences between gcc and gcc.295 etc due
> >to some commits being deliberately left out.
> 
> OK; I think the following may qualify as something broken that you
> requested notification about:

This is *very* strange:

> ===> gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb
> ...
> cc -O -pipe  -D_GNU_SOURCE -I- -I. .... -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb.291/gdb

Thus this is -current.  However, current is still using
src/contrib/gcc.295, so you should see zero problems in HEAD.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011109104631.A51278>