Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 10:46:31 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, peter@wemm.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: cvs repository surgery Message-ID: <20011109104631.A51278@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200111091539.fA9FdSf88433@bunrab.catwhisker.org>; from david@catwhisker.org on Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 07:39:28AM -0800 References: <20011109001626.11DF43807@overcee.netplex.com.au> <200111091539.fA9FdSf88433@bunrab.catwhisker.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 07:39:28AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > >Yes, there are some intentional differences between gcc and gcc.295 etc due > >to some commits being deliberately left out. > > OK; I think the following may qualify as something broken that you > requested notification about: This is *very* strange: > ===> gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb > ... > cc -O -pipe -D_GNU_SOURCE -I- -I. .... -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb.291/gdb Thus this is -current. However, current is still using src/contrib/gcc.295, so you should see zero problems in HEAD. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011109104631.A51278>