Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 11:37:30 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Scott Long <scottl@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/random probe.c src/sys/opencrypto deflate.c Message-ID: <429B4F5A.4050705@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <20050530091556.A52379@fledge.watson.org> References: <200505300501.j4U51ikj070065@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050530091556.A52379@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Watson wrote: > > On Mon, 30 May 2005, Scott Long wrote: > >> malloc.h relies on param.h for a definition of MAXCPU. I guess that >> there is >> other header pollution that makes this work right now, but it falls >> over when >> doing a RELENG_5 -> HEAD upgrade. > > > Odd -- I added a nested include of param.h from malloc.h to catch this. > While almost certainly a bad idea (your fix is better), if you had the > latest revision of malloc.h, it shouldn't have broken the build... Was > your malloc.h slightly stale, or is there more to it than that? > > I'll basck out my change to malloc.h now that the dependencies are > fixed. Thanks! > > Robert N M Watson Maybe I did have a stale tree. I can't check it now since I already did another source update. Thanks for the explaination, though. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?429B4F5A.4050705>