Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:32:50 +0400 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc hosts.allow Message-ID: <20060830203250.GA11411@rambler-co.ru> In-Reply-To: <86zmdmfoow.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <200608290920.k7T9KmV9067843@repoman.freebsd.org> <86zmdmfoow.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 01:27:59PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > Modified files: > > etc hosts.allow > > Log: > > Comment out lines that use example addresses and example.com names so > > that local changes can be made more easily (without having to comment > > these lines, and making the diff more readable). >=20 > That reminds me - /etc/hosts is another file that mergemaster often > trips over. The comments and examples it contains should be moved to > the appropriate man page(s) if they aren't there already. In fact, we > should probably remove the file from the tree, and just have > sysinstall create one at install time. >=20 Not everyone uses sysinstall(8) to install the systems (I rarely use it, for example). And I'm not sure that having no /etc/hosts file is acceptable. As opposed to having NO /etc/hosts.allow file, which is perfectly valid. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE9fXyqRfpzJluFF4RAodKAJ9AsZYzSFg8T8o0tBrxrBqm2TJeEACfUtqI DahpqEBeWF3jlj59b4ex9Ys= =Mcg0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060830203250.GA11411>