Date: Tue, 24 Sep 1996 22:23:21 -0700
From: Jason Downs <downsj@teeny.org>
To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
Cc: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu>, Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net>, Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: install on {Net,Open}BSD vs install on FreeBSD
Message-ID: <199609250523.WAA04910@threadway.teeny.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 24 Sep 1996 22:10:45 MDT." <199609250410.WAA10368@rocky.mt.sri.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
In message <199609250410.WAA10368@rocky.mt.sri.com>, Nate Williams writes: >> of the case is based on compatibility. I've disagreed with Richard in the >> past when he was using the compatibility to move us towards SYSV without a >> strong reason, but since we ARE bsd, and the -d option IS bsd, the > >The -d option *ISN'T* BSD. It was added by J.T. in NetBSD, and when >OpenBSD took the entire NetBSD source tree over it was there as well. >I'll bet BSDi doesn't have it, and neither does Ultrix, which are also >BSD based systems. Maybe not, but it *is* SunOS, and it *is* GNU, and ... etc. -- Jason Downs (503) 256-8535 -/- (503) 952-3749 downsj@teeny.org --> teeny.org: Free Software for a Free Internet <-- http://www.teeny.org/ OpenBSD: The BSD with a soul. http://www.openbsd.org/help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609250523.WAA04910>