Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 16:02:27 -0700 From: Sean Bruno <sean_bruno@yahoo.com> To: sbruno@freebsd.org Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: i386 panic Message-ID: <1376348547.1469.59.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1376336582.1469.9.camel@localhost> References: <1376336582.1469.9.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-e06HTAfYU6xnTfcCC5Jf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 12:43 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/10_i386_vmfault.txt >=20 > I can never tell if stuff like this is because I'm not nerfing the > system RAM correctly or if this is i386 bit-rot. =20 >=20 > I set hw.physmem=3D"2g" in loader.conf to try and get the system to boot, > but I don't think I did it right? >=20 > Sean The 9.2RC images seem to do the same thing when nerfed to 2G of ram. So, this doesn't appear to be a new regression. =20 stable/7 seems to be happy enough to boot up PAE i386 on it, so I think the previous suggestion of using PAE is the correct one. --=-e06HTAfYU6xnTfcCC5Jf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJSCWmDAAoJEBkJRdwI6BaH/WQH/R22MHvnPxWQWlWY99Z11LHE x4MlFMbWd2W2qNjIYM5z7wUctG/rRpN6DOQy/gMT/x7jFLpTcOpewzkjdonnRjv/ Y0C2j/ueQWyuCCFPR6z+nNOo0xXrYkMgUIDSwssteHi/bK+EldyqNQwEGp/+PnBv gx4JhRZxVKtaIQpwZjQqBNKsbnlVSy/UVSdN+OLMpXzLgS+VIda00Y8BMONhVf7f DbCYSkpvgymmRN2PuBhpUGjrGfzMA4KW4we6MkfTWQXmp1q5C/vbxV/HGURXF1Ln QeXr03h0zgzDZCobeBATvW0sFX468l2J6VSVxgt6pdXSKRwzYwNLQ5M9v738e8k= =hJ5R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-e06HTAfYU6xnTfcCC5Jf--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1376348547.1469.59.camel>