Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 08:59:46 -0700 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org> To: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r267898 - in head: cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/dtrace/test/tst/common/aggs cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtrace/common sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/sys Message-ID: <92E13997-8653-4A99-912A-F06540EA22C8@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <A70E8606-2805-4A58-BA6E-C8235F6E8F4A@freebsd.org> References: <201406260706.s5Q76hYW014217@svn.freebsd.org> <53ABC9FE.4000107@FreeBSD.org> <A70E8606-2805-4A58-BA6E-C8235F6E8F4A@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 26, 2014, at 1:16, Pedro Giffuni <pfg@freebsd.org> wrote: > 2) It is not respecting the order in which upstream (Illumos AFAICT) = adds features so it breaks the sense of DT_VERS_LATEST I disagree. I specifically added a new version, 1.9.2, which is not = present in Illumos to cope with this. DT_VERS_LATEST points to our = latest version, not Illumos latest version. I don't think it's = necessary to merge all the other versions when we can have our own = version number. -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?92E13997-8653-4A99-912A-F06540EA22C8>