Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 12:00:05 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Kevin Sanders <newroswell@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Fabr?cio Barros Cabral <fxcabral@yahoo.com.br> Subject: Re: Intercepting a packet, changing it and re-injecting into the network Message-ID: <45902DC5.6030101@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <375baf50612230855o114c4c32gff314327a0b8a05b@mail.gmail.com> References: <1166802209.7642.17.camel@hades.no-ip.org> <20061222160550.GD47710@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <375baf50612220932m30f84567jdda28b7fc0e62e61@mail.gmail.com> <458C6ACC.2020605@elischer.org> <458C6CDF.4010203@elischer.org> <375baf50612230855o114c4c32gff314327a0b8a05b@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kevin Sanders wrote: > On 12/22/06, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> wrote: >> >> >> just as a reference point, >> Using ipfw I was able to saturate a Gb bridge >> (between 2 bge interfaces) while filtereing against a >> table of 128000 addresses. (in FreeBSD 4.8) using 30% cpu.. >> machines have gotten faster since then but the OS has slowed a bit. >> > > That's what I'm looking for. Were you using polling or any non-default HZ > setting for that? Thanks. > > Kevin > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" it was 4.11 remember but I had no nonstandard settings. We've moved to 6.1 but I have not repeated the tests yet.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45902DC5.6030101>