Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 01:16:25 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> Subject: Re: NSS and PAM, dynamic vs. static Message-ID: <xzpzneg81wm.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20031126130402.GB57523@madman.celabo.org> (Jacques A. Vidrine's message of "Wed, 26 Nov 2003 07:04:02 -0600") References: <20031125025621.453732A8FC@canning.wemm.org> <200311250311.hAP3BTCO075916@apollo.backplane.com> <20031125150700.GA48007@madman.celabo.org> <20031125201421.GB54467@madman.celabo.org> <200311252039.hAPKdBfq080963@apollo.backplane.com> <m37k1ox7tz.fsf_-_@merlin.emma.line.org> <20031126130402.GB57523@madman.celabo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> writes: > NSS and PAM do not overlap. They are complimentary and one cannot do > the job of the other. That is a bug in NSS, PAM or both. (BTW, I think you mean that they are complementary, not complimentary, although it is certainly true that some implementations of NSS and PAM are free) DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpzneg81wm.fsf>