Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 01:45:21 -0500 From: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/msun/i387 fenv.c fenv.h Message-ID: <20050318064521.GA42508@VARK.MIT.EDU> In-Reply-To: <20050317.233645.74714466.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20050318055212.GA70385@FreeBSD.org> <20050318061647.GA40922@VARK.MIT.EDU> <423A7277.1000202@samsco.org> <20050317.233645.74714466.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005, Warner Losh wrote: > > You had better bump the version number for libm before 6.0 rolls > > around!! I've just found a 3rd party binary-only package that > > supports 'FreeBSD 5.x' but is linked against libm.so.2. Ugh. We > > need to bury that mistake and NOT make it again. > > 6.0 already has /lib/libm.so.3 So does 5.3. I think Scott's point is that if we're going to bump it for 6.X at all, we had better do it soon or risk running into the same mess we had before. I agree with that, although at present I don't know of a compelling reason to do the bump the libm version number at all.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050318064521.GA42508>