Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 00:51:59 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> Cc: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105170042200.10277-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <200105160751.f4G7pqN77048@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <20010516101947.B23288@sunbay.com> Ruslan Ermilov writes: > : FWIW, my gross hack to usr.sbin/kbdcontrol also worked: > > I tend to dislike adding ../../sys to the includes list since they > might not be compatible with the host's sys files used to build libc. I'd like to remove all the existing ones. They are a hack to handle the case where you haven't bootstrapped properly. They intentionally give <sys> includes which may be incompatible with the host ones, in case the host ones are out of date relative to the src tree. This depends on only a few headers like <sys/user.h> being out of date, and sometimes helps mainly for headers like <sys/user.h> which declare system structures that are groped in by userland. But it is just a bug in general. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0105170042200.10277-100000>