Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 20:16:59 +0000 From: "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" <stephen@missouri.edu> To: "ctm-users@freebsd.org" <ctm-users@freebsd.org> Subject: CTM vs subversion, was: http://mailman.berklix.org/mailman/listinfo now has all delta lists Message-ID: <e79e6964-0ad4-f1de-3230-cdcf7a782531@missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <DE44D887-F1B4-49B6-B02C-FF6FABB9F6D6@freebsd.org> References: <201909122343.x8CNgwm2091270@fire.js.berklix.net> <DE44D887-F1B4-49B6-B02C-FF6FABB9F6D6@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/12/19 9:47 PM, Philip Paeps wrote: > I should point out that the FreeBSD Project has moved to Subversion more than eleven years ago and is actively looking into moving to Git. There is a limit to how much time any of us are willing to put into keeping a hack around two revision control systems ago alive. I didn't realize it was eleven years that FreeBSD moved to subversion. It was at this point that I personally moved completely away from CTM. I maintain CTM as a service to you guys. What are the barriers that stop you moving to subversion? I really like subversion, because it gives me the version control that CVS couldn't do easily. The version control across many different computers is what made me like CTM, but when they switched from CVS to subversion, I found that subversion gives me everything I wanted, plus a lot more.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e79e6964-0ad4-f1de-3230-cdcf7a782531>