Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 22:07:25 -0400 From: "Danny J. Zerkel" <dzerkel@columbus.rr.com> To: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Message-ID: <390F89DD.9798D712@columbus.rr.com> References: <v0422080ab53464df3042@[195.238.1.121]> <v04210103b53525f556d6@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
One of the things to consider is the number of places db is used in FreeBSD code. Any bugs in db can manifest in any of these: contrib/bind contrib/global contrib/nvi contrib/perl5 contrib/sendmail crypto/kerberosIV crypto/heimdal lib/libc/gen/devname.c lib/libc/gen/getcap.c lib/libc/gen/getpwent.c lib/libc/gen/ttyname.c libexec/ypxfr sbin/init sys/dev/aic7xxx usr.bin/finger usr.bin/tsort usr.bin/vacation usr.sbin/sa usr.sbin/rpc.yppasswdd usr.sbin/rpc.ypupdated usr.sbin/ypserv contrib/amd contrib/cvs lib/libkvm pr/9350 is an example of db bugs effecting vi. (Would someone PLEASE apply the simple patch and close the damn PR!) -- Danny J. Zerkel dzerkel@columbus.rr.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?390F89DD.9798D712>