Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:24:05 -0700 From: VDR User <user.vdr@gmail.com> To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org, nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de Cc: Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> Subject: Re: Low-power HTPC etc Message-ID: <AANLkTi=bhtZz=pxGtVG0UP%2B7CTzAyU7vnAzMS1wA-sVn@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201103182328.p2INSUmB034700@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <freebsd-x11.61664.1300389470.201103171854.p2HIsdbV038834@triton8.kn-bremen.de> <201103182328.p2INSUmB034700@lurza.secnetix.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> wro= te: > =C2=A0> > Well, the Atom N330 has a TDP of only 8 W, which isn't > =C2=A0> > that bad for a 1.6 GHz 64bit 4-way processor (2 cores + > =C2=A0> > hyperthreading). > =C2=A0> > > =C2=A0> > Of course, ARM processors may certainly have even better > =C2=A0> > performance/watt ratio. =C2=A0But I think I stay with i386- > =C2=A0> > compatible hardware for my particular case. > =C2=A0> > =C2=A0> Btw there's also the Celeron SU2300 which has a TDP of 10 W and i= s > =C2=A0> about twice as fast as the N330 Atom as you can see e.g. here: > =C2=A0> > =C2=A0> =C2=A0 =C2=A0http://www.notebookcheck.net/Mobile-Processors-Bench= marklist.2436.0.html > > Interesting page. =C2=A0But I think that the benchmarks need to > be taken with a grain of salt. =C2=A0For example, the SU2300 > seems to be twice as fast only in the single-threaded > benchmarks. =C2=A0In the multi-threaded benchmarks, the SU2300 > is only a little faster (10 - 20 percent). > > The Atom will be more than enough for me. =C2=A0There are several > fanless (!) mainboards with a dual-core Atom (330 or D525) > that have the ION chipset with full-HD MPEG acceleration > via VDPAU. =C2=A0I'll probably combine that with an SSD in order > to get a completely silent system without any moving parts. I have a couple atom/ion boxes which I use for dedicated htpc/hdtv. Works great. I didn't even bother with an ssd due to price vs. needs. Instead they're installed on sdhc cards. No probs what-so-ever.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=bhtZz=pxGtVG0UP%2B7CTzAyU7vnAzMS1wA-sVn>