Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:01:41 -0700 From: "Dave Thaler" <dthaler@Exchange.Microsoft.com> To: "Brian Zill" <bzill@microsoft.com>, "f.johan.beisser" <jan@caustic.org>, "Brad Huntting" <huntting@hunkular.glarp.com> Cc: <snap-users@kame.net>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>, <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>, <ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com> Subject: RE: 6over4 for KAME (FreeBSD) Message-ID: <5B90AD65A9E8934987DB0C8C0762657401D42BFD@DF-BOWWOW.platinum.corp.microsoft.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Brian Zill writes: > Aren't two interoperating implementations a requirement for Proposed > Standard? No, I believe it's a requirement for *Draft* Standard. -Dave [-- Attachment #2 --] <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.0.4576.0"> <TITLE>RE: 6over4 for KAME (FreeBSD)</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> <!-- Converted from text/plain format --> <P><FONT SIZE=2>Brian Zill writes:</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> Aren't two interoperating implementations a requirement for Proposed</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> Standard?</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=2>No, I believe it's a requirement for *Draft* Standard.</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=2>-Dave</FONT> </P> </BODY> </HTML>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5B90AD65A9E8934987DB0C8C0762657401D42BFD>