Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 23:00:12 -0700 From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> To: "Micheal Patterson" <micheal@tsgincorporated.com>, <TM4525@aol.com>, <stefan@swebase.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Serious investigations into UNIX and Windows Message-ID: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNMEIPEPAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> In-Reply-To: <055301c4bc4a$07dc5ae0$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: Micheal Patterson [mailto:micheal@tsgincorporated.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 10:26 AM > To: Ted Mittelstaedt; TM4525@aol.com; stefan@swebase.com > Cc: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Serious investigations into UNIX and Windows > > > Bottom Line. > > We're lazy, we've always been lazy and damn it, we WILL always look for > something easier, more convienient that can do more. > Until something cheaper comes along. Eazy+costly= nogo Complex+cheap=don'tlike,but will do if it's cheaper than everything else easy+cheap=everyone's favorite Note that easy+cheap generally <> reliable but that is a different argument. > So, to you, Windows is harder to administrate, to me Unix is harder to > administrate. THAT is a supportable position, and I agree that it is true for many. It however leaves the question of which is more complicated, still open. Ted
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNMEIPEPAA.tedm>