Date: Mon, 12 Jun 1995 10:31:01 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Cc: root@dva.in-berlin.de, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Which CTM# == 2.0.5R? Message-ID: <199506121731.KAA02459@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> In-Reply-To: <199506121708.TAA04634@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Jun 12, 95 07:08:26 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > As Boris Staeblow wrote: > > > > Which CTM# is the last before 2.0.5R ? (src and ports) > > I doubt it would help you very much. The final release work has been > done on a branch that's currently being back-integrated into the head > of the CVS tree. So the last regular CTM update will miss the fixes > from the branch. And /usr/src and thus ctm on freefall was cvs update -r RELENG_2_0_5 about 2 weeks ago, so the CTM's are following right along... > The last CTM level i've got for cvs-cur (the exportable CVS-current > tree) is 770. Since this tree does contain the branch, too (of > course), it might be of some use for all who need it. Do not offer out the cvs bits to the public, or be prepared to loose your access to them.... > I assume, you should wait until the next CTM update appears, it will > contain the bits from 2.0.5R re-integrated. Most likely quite wrong, as /usr/src will become 2.2 on freefall, and since that source tree was very very old it was checked out with a CVSROOT that was wrong. I am patching in the correct cvs root which will effect a lot of files (anything with $Header$ in it). -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Custom computers for FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506121731.KAA02459>