Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 18:28:52 +0200 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: buildworld fails on recent stable Message-ID: <5097E944.1000405@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5097E2AF.2010000@FreeBSD.org> References: <5097A5E0.2000502@gmail.com> <5097D27E.1050705@FreeBSD.org> <5097DE5E.6020405@FreeBSD.org> <5097E0BD.50909@gmail.com> <5097E2AF.2010000@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
05.11.2012 18:00, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> I bet on clang 3.2. > > Thank you for checking. > > So how do we proceed from here? > I could just revert the MFC-es, but the functionality could be desirable to some > users. Are there any alternatives? Dunno, clang 3.2 is still pending so I guess it wouldn't be MFC'ed until December 16th? Being a minor issue it can make some people shrug from using clang for testing stable... I think reverting the working change is not good as far as building world with clang is still not the true and default way. -- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5097E944.1000405>