Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 07:04:15 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: lev@FreeBSD.org Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel D2500CC motherboard and strange RS232/UART behavior Message-ID: <55881.1365577455@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <1424327083.20130410103010@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <229402991.20130407172016@serebryakov.spb.ru> <5847.1365365701@critter.freebsd.dk> <CAJ-Vmo=_9rL4FarGqBS0BkC-vPg=LbFt3boYk73QijaB6=0Q-A@mail.gmail.com> <201304091608.09257.jhb@freebsd.org> <105818341.20130410004451@serebryakov.spb.ru> <54189.1365540724@critter.freebsd.dk> <1424327083.20130410103010@serebryakov.spb.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <1424327083.20130410103010@serebryakov.spb.ru>, Lev Serebryakov writ es: >Hello, Poul-Henning. >You wrote 10 =E0=EF=F0=E5=EB=FF 2013 =E3., 0:52:04: > >>> Problem is, that every uart device now is independent from each >>> other in good "OOP" style, and it looks like interrupt sharing we >>> need one interrupt handler per irq (not per device), which will now >>> about several UARTs. Something like "multiport" device, bot not >>> exactly. >PHK> That is what the puc(4) driver does... > Yes, for PCI devices only :( Yes, it needs to learn to do it from hints for ISA. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55881.1365577455>