Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 17 Feb 2017 02:33:04 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 217138] head (e.g.) -r313783 sh vs. jemalloc asserts: include/jemalloc/internal/tsd.h:687: Failed assertion: "tsd_booted"
Message-ID:  <bug-217138-8-bXheSdFtW8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-217138-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-217138-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217138

--- Comment #2 from Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> ---
If one is going to look into this in a amd64
context it is important to be using head -r313772
or later in order to avoid fork sometimes not
preserving the stack pointer on the child-process
side of things --at least if experimenting with
port or buildworld buildkernel builds as a means
of testing.

Getting past that stack pointer problem is what
allowed me to see this problem during build
activity, which started me down this exploration.

[My tests for aborting in sh`forkshell if fork changes
the stack pointer are still in place but there have
been no failures so far.]

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-217138-8-bXheSdFtW8>