Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 09:21:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new license idea? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009190921230.85547-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20000919160157.A70731@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, j mckitrick wrote:
> What about a license where all changes must be returned to the
> original author, but do not have to be made public? This way, the
> author will not be locked out of improvements to his/her code, and yet
> it will be at their discretion if they include them in their own code
> or not. At the same time, those changes would not *have* to be made
> public.
>
> This probably has major holes, but after reading
> yet-another-license-flame-war, it got me thinking.
The solution to yet-another-license-flamewar is yet-another-license? :-)
Kris
--
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0009190921230.85547-100000>