Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1995 23:17:59 +0100 (MET) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: clock running faster? Message-ID: <199510202217.XAA12519@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <9510201426.AA09055@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> from "Garrett A. Wollman" at Oct 20, 95 10:26:22 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Garrett A. Wollman wrote: > > >> The changes have the effect of making the Pentium clock the reference. > > > I don't think this has been a good idea. > > Please explain your reason for believing this, keeping in mind that a > similar technique was used on MicroVAXen in 4.3 (except using > microtime() rather than a purpose-built function). I simply don't trust the PeeCee industry to even bother making the CPU clock an exact frequency. OTOH, they seem to be somewhat eager to keep in spec with the 14.318... MHz clock bas where the timer input is derived from (since otherwise the MSDOG clock would also be wrong). Remember that not all people around do live in NTPland. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510202217.XAA12519>