Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 12:20:07 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suid bit sshd Message-ID: <xzpy8ka3yco.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20040820114001.R28976@mp2.macomnet.net> (Maxim Konovalov's message of "Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:49:43 %2B0400 (MSD)") References: <200408131332.09164.ilkerozupak@yahoo.com> <20040813104934.GL87690@submonkey.net> <200408131436.12750.ilkerozupak@yahoo.com> <20040813153607.GF4198@dan.emsphone.com> <20040820114001.R28976@mp2.macomnet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> writes: > DES, is it OK to commit a following patch? Or you were going to > deprecate ENABLE_SUID_SSH? We still have it in make.conf(5), > share/examples/etc/make.conf and ssh-keysign/Makefile. The whole point with ssh-keysign is to separate out the parts of ssh that need a setuid bit. It should not be necessary for ssh to have a setuid bit if ssh-keysign does, which is what ENABLE_SUID_SSH controls these days. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpy8ka3yco.fsf>