Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 06 May 2007 21:47:45 +0100
From:      Rui Paulo <rpaulo@fnop.net>
To:        attilio@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@FreeBSD.org>, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: PERFORCE change 119366 for review
Message-ID:  <86irb51xxq.wl%rpaulo@fnop.net>
In-Reply-To: <463EACD7.8000905@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200705062022.l46KMIud093057@repoman.freebsd.org> <463EACD7.8000905@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Mon, 07 May 2007 06:36:39 +0200,
Attilio Rao wrote:
> 
> Being more specific, you don't need lock at all there.
> wrmsr/cpuid are atomic. So you don't need to hang at all there.

What about rdmsr ?




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86irb51xxq.wl%rpaulo>