Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Feb 2024 08:09:14 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        wireless@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 275255] iwlwifi: panic after iwlwifi0: lkpi_iv_newstate: error -5 during state transition 5 (RUN) -> 0 (INIT)
Message-ID:  <bug-275255-21060-DHweAvjyk0@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-275255-21060@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-275255-21060@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D275255

--- Comment #8 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org ---
A commit in branch stable/13 references this bug:

URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3Da7e1fc7f620d3341549c1380f550aaafb=
db45622

commit a7e1fc7f620d3341549c1380f550aaafbdb45622
Author:     Bjoern A. Zeeb <bz@FreeBSD.org>
AuthorDate: 2024-01-10 10:14:16 +0000
Commit:     Bjoern A. Zeeb <bz@FreeBSD.org>
CommitDate: 2024-02-19 08:02:01 +0000

    net80211: deal with lost state transitions

    Since 5efea30f039c4 we can possibly lose a state transition which can
    cause trouble further down the road.
    The reproducer from 643d6dce6c1e can trigger these for example.
    Drivers for firmware based wireless cards have worked around some of
    this (and other) problems in the past.

    Add an array of tasks rather than a single one as we would simply
    get npending > 1 and lose order with other tasks.  Try to keep state
    changes updated as queued in case we end up with more than one at a
    time.  While this is not ideal either (call it a hack) it will sort
    the problem for now.
    We will queue in ieee80211_new_state_locked() and do checks there
    and dequeue in ieee80211_newstate_cb().
    If we still overrun the (currently) 8 slots we will drop the state
    change rather than overwrite the last one.
    When dequeing we will update iv_nstate and keep it around for historic
    reasons for the moment.

    The longer term we should make the callers of
    ieee80211_new_state[_locked]() actually use the returned errors
    and act appropriately but that will touch a lot more places and
    drivers (possibly incl. changed behaviour for ioctls).

    rtwn(4) and rum(4) should probably be revisted and net80211 internals
    removed (for rum(4) at least the current logic still seems prone to
    races).

    PR:             271979, 271988, 275255, 263613, 274003
    Sponsored by:   The FreeBSD Foundation (in 2023)
    Reviewed by:    cc
    Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D43389

    (cherry picked from commit 713db49d06deee90dd358b2e4b9ca05368a5eaf6)

    Given this changes the internal structure of 'struct ieee80211vap',
    which gets allocated by the drivers, and we do not have enough
    spares, all wireless drivers need to be recompiled.
    Given we are forced to do the update, we leave fields in the middle
    of the struct and add more spares at the same time.
    __FreeBSD_version gets updated to 1303501 to be able to detect
    this change.

    (cherry picked from commit a890a3a5ddf33acb0a4000885945b89156799b07)

 UPDATING                       |   6 ++
 sys/dev/rtwn/if_rtwn.c         |   4 +-
 sys/dev/usb/wlan/if_rum.c      |   4 +-
 sys/net80211/ieee80211.c       |   4 +-
 sys/net80211/ieee80211_ddb.c   |  15 ++++-
 sys/net80211/ieee80211_proto.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---=
----
 sys/net80211/ieee80211_var.h   |  18 +++---
 sys/sys/param.h                |   2 +-
 8 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-275255-21060-DHweAvjyk0>