Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 22:01:19 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org> Cc: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 9b76228006d8 - main - inpcb: retire inp_vnet Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=4F7y2sZ3=2t8DhwMyVnkjCcm7ovu3Ybkknxp=374-Rg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <aeFPJWT7V4aJX_-F@nuc> References: <69de65eb.21a5c.61244c2a@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <aeFPJWT7V4aJX_-F@nuc>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Thu, 16 Apr 2026 at 14:05, Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > It's possible to have inp->inp_socket == NULL here. This is triggered > by the sys/netinet/tcp_hpts_test.py tests. > > > /* Lets do any logging that we might want to */ > > tcp_hpts_log(hpts, tp, &tv, slots_to_run, i, from_callout); > > Do you think it's worth reverting? it's been a couple days and I just got emailed about that test failing after I landed some unrelated stuff! -ahome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=4F7y2sZ3=2t8DhwMyVnkjCcm7ovu3Ybkknxp=374-Rg>