Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:47:44 -0800
From:      Joe Rhett <jrhett@meer.net>
To:        Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: is rebooting after a page fault disabled in 5.3-release?
Message-ID:  <20041215004744.GJ27283@meer.net>
In-Reply-To: <20041213183518.N97507@carver.gumbysoft.com>
References:  <20041213052628.GB78120@meer.net> <20041213054159.GC78120@meer.net> <20041213075943.GA3909@meer.net> <20041213102944.D92964@carver.gumbysoft.com> <20041213190532.GA4781@meer.net> <20041213183518.N97507@carver.gumbysoft.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Joe Rhett wrote:
> > > > As another side note, is there a reason that 5.3 doesn't reboot after page
> > > > faults?  The crash and dumpdev man pages still indicate that it should.
> > > > This makes this problem hard to work on (must be at facility to debug..)

> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Joe Rhett wrote:
> > Sorry, 5.3-RELEASE with GENERIC kernel.  This is a sandbox ;-)
 
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 06:37:29PM -0800, Doug White wrote:
> I in fact tested this on Saturday and it in fact rebooted.  With GENERIC,
> even. The digi driver sort of got left behind with the tty changes and
> handed out uninitialized mutexes that trip null pointer panics.  Machine
> came back up fine, so unless you have some type of panic that screws up
> the system enough to disrupt booting then it should work.

How do you know which is which?  Anything in the page fault to indicate that?

So anyway, I guess ATA code being upset is enough to hang it.  Not good.

-- 
Joe Rhett
Senior Geek
Meer.net



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041215004744.GJ27283>