Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 09:00:01 -0700 From: uk1@irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (Ulf Kieber) To: freebsd-bugs Subject: Re: docs/735: missing description for mount options in fstab(5) man page Message-ID: <199509251600.JAA15197@freefall.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
The following reply was made to PR docs/735; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: uk1@irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (Ulf Kieber)
To: wollman@lcs.mit.edu (Garrett A. Wollman)
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: docs/735: missing description for mount options in fstab(5) man page
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 16:50:33 +0100 (MET)
Garrett A. Wollman writes:
> <<On Sun, 24 Sep 1995 02:42:16 +0100, kieber@sax.sax.de said:
>
> > Except of ``userquota'' and ``groupquota'' all descriptions for mount
> > options (e. g. ``intr'', ``soft'', ``bg'', etc.) are completely
> > missing from the man pages. The possible options should be listed
> > stating which fs types they are valid for.
>
> This is intentional.
>
> 1) The old-style options are deprecated, and weren't even
> supported by 4.4-Lite.
>
> 2) The options are documented in the mount_foo(8) pages. It
> is a bad idea to document them in fifteen different places.
That is not the point. Look in mount_nfs(8), you'll find a command
line option ``-i'' for mount_nfs, but you won't find, what's supposed
to go into /etc/fstab. I can _guess_ that I have to change the
the line
/ftp@somewhere.dom.ain /ftp nfs ro,soft,intr,bg 0 0
to
/ftp@somewhere.dom.ain /ftp nfs ro,-s,-i,-b 0 0
or
/ftp@somewhere.dom.ain /ftp nfs ro,s,i,b 0 0
or what? The man pages are not very clear about the new option
style.
--
Ulf Kieber
<{uk1, news}@irz.inf.tu-dresden.de>;
<kieber@sax.sax.de>; <ulf@maria.wustl.edu>
Don't expect me to be a breeder, and I won't assume you're a fag.
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509251600.JAA15197>