Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:46:05 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: <application> appearance in HTML Message-ID: <20140630124605.7e08b705@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1406292134010.20434@lightning.wonkity.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Hi Warren, On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 21:39:47 -0600 (MDT) Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wrote: > Erich Dollansky wrote: > > > I would keep it and I would keep it as bold. I would only recommend > > a consequent use of it. Using bold helps to find important > > locations a bit faster without reading the whole sentence. > ... > > The moment the highlighting will only be used for the application > > and not for the manufacturer, it will be very helpful for the > > reader. > > Sorry, I missed this message until posting the link to the thread in > the commit message. > do not worry about this. > A problem with highlighting in general is that too much of it hides > detail. Some sections of our documents look like "poison pen" > letters due to all the highlighting. This is the negative side effect. > > For now, let's try letting application names just be pointed out by > capital letters. If that does not work, we can try something else. We will see the result and the comments soon. Erichhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140630124605.7e08b705>