Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 10:39:04 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> Cc: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>, rob@ideal.net.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPDIVERT broken? Message-ID: <2972.864236344@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 21 May 1997 10:14:03 PDT." <33832D5B.13728473@whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Despite this, I agree with garrett's changes, but wish he'd done the > other protocols while he had it all in his head. I agree with his changes too, just not the fashion in which they were done. In any case, with the possible exception of Bruce, I think there is enough core team agreement about this that I hope this will be the last time we see something done this way. I personally don't mind waiting longer for a commit if it also means it'll be done fully and correctly, and the next time I see a "I'm going to do xxx which breaks the tree" message go by, I'm going to respond with "No, you most certainly are not. Do the commit and fix the tree at the same time or simply forget about until you're genuinely ready." Unintentional breakage is something else, of course, and not within the scope of this discussion. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2972.864236344>