Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 20:32:02 +0800 From: Martin Wilke <miwi@FreeBSD.org> To: Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xf86-video-intel and UMS Message-ID: <AANLkTinS0PYTJfjB5t88dkJMjN9H0V-i-P2n6Otb2bWu@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin_X1trb7xZjVv37qQtyL6mVpbq08A8oxggVcCs@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTinerUWHxiV9YrzHKRimqPAaPEaQhyME-oS9uju1@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=WfitL6YMqB%2B7qKqwbjH8TUs0aLAaQufBPTbjq@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTin71eOjJYQUDO5X%2Bc8tEetvGrhXoa7WbJ%2By3mz6@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTin_X1trb7xZjVv37qQtyL6mVpbq08A8oxggVcCs@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org> wrote: > 2011/3/4 Lucius Windschuh <lwindschuh@googlemail.com>: > > 2011/3/4 Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org>: > >> Can someone explain why is xf86-video-intel 2.7.1 used in ports? Unless > >> I missed something, the GIT repository in FDO has more recent branches > >> where UMS hasn't been removed yet: > >> > >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel/log/?h=2.8 > >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel/log/?h=2.9 > >> > >> Is 2.7.1 really the latest portable version? > > > > It's at least the last version that works reliably and is compatible > > to our libdrm, as I see it. > > The xf86-video-intel v2.9 triggers assertions in our libdrm_intel.so.1 > > (just tested it) :-( > > Why not upgrade libdrm then? Is there a problem with versions > newer than 2.4.17? > > FreeBSD doen't have GEM and KSM support yet.. > -- > Robert Millan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinS0PYTJfjB5t88dkJMjN9H0V-i-P2n6Otb2bWu>