Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:55:42 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@freebsd.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?! Message-ID: <20060910005505.H1031@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20060910024047.GA73879@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200609100159.k8A1xAIn089481@drugs.dv.isc.org> <20060909231448.E1031@ganymede.hub.org> <20060910024047.GA73879@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 11:16:29PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> >> This should be documented somewhere clearly then, as my understanding was >> that -STABLE meant that anything MFCd back to it *was* tested and deemed >> stable ... > > You mean like in the FreeBSD handbook? It's not anyone else's fault > if you haven't read the documentation. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html I swear, the last time I searched for a definition of STABLE vs CURRENT/HEAD, that wsan't there ... but, granted, that was a very very long time ago ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060910005505.H1031>